Solar electric systems, like this one recently installed in Edgecomb, Maine, reduce the burden on the electric grid during summer 'peaks,' thus saving all New England Ratepayers money.
There are very few true 'win wins' in the energy challenges facing society. Luckily for all of us, solar is one of those few things, where when one someone installs it, everyone wins.
Some incredible solar factoids:
Sound incredible? It is, but it's all true, and it's why we love being in the solar business so much!
We're going to spend some time talking about point #1, since the issue of solar and costs to maintain the grid has been in the news a lot recently.
In addition to a Smart Meter - which tracks solar production out to the grid, and consumption in from the grid - many solar installations now also require a dedicated meter to track ALL solar production (both 'behind the meter' power consumed on site, and power export to the grid).
Back when we started, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, battery-based systems were the only way to go solar. These were systems installed at camps, compounds - places well off the trodden path. In those situations, solar was often the only choice for energy.
By the mid 2000s, grid-tied inverters were entering the US market in a big way, allowing homeowners and small businesses to utilize net metering rules. Net metering (itself a pretty new invention at that time) was actually shaped around the needs of analog utility meters - when a solar array produced electricity, it would spin the meter backwards. When the customer needed power from the utility, the meter would go forwards. At the end of the month, the utility reconciles the meter (on net , did it go forward or did it go backwards?) and applies a credit appropriately.
Flash forward ten years, and analog metering has been replaced with digital meters, and the cost of solar has declined by more than 70%. In New Hampshire, solar has grown by close to 400% (!!!) leading to hitting net metering 'caps' that were arbitrarily assigned years ago. In Maine, there is no "Cap," but Maine has hit 1% solar penetration, which has prompted a 'review' by Maine's PUC (happening over the next few months).
So about all those grid-connected, net-metered solar arrays... How are they working out for society?
Well, we already know the answer to that question - net metered customers are actually giving back value to the grid - above and beyond the compensation they get from offsetting their own power bill!
ISO New England's "ISO to Go" app explains what happens on hot, sunny days.
New England's grid operator, ISO New England, built a neat app called " ISO to Go ." The App will tell you in real time what the current load is on the grid, what the current wholesale price per megawatt-hour is, and what the real time fuel mix is.
To understand solar's value to the grid, you must understand three facts:
To quote ISO New England directly, "During times of peak demand, the economic and environmental costs of producing electric energy increase as the fuel mix changes to include more expensive, higher emission fuels." ( ISO To Go app , "About the Power Grid").
This load graph from a day in July shows how solar actually reduces the utility grid's peak substantially. By reducing grid peaks, solar reduces costs for all electric ratepayers. Chart directly from ISO New England (operators of the electric grid in Mane, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, and Connecticut)
This slide show how a solar kilowatt-hour is determined in the latest update to Maine's "Value of Solar" study. For our purposes, we highlight all of the direct benefits to other electric ratepayers and use it to calculate the share of the grid expenses you're helping to pay for by purchasing and generating solar. Yes, we are omitting societal benefits for the purposes of this math and completing omitting the subject of climate change. This math is purely based on hard costs borne by all ratepayers who have to pay for grid upgrades and infrastructure driven by power peak loads. We also used a conservative projection of 1,200 kWh per kilowatt of installed solar, to adjust for some systems not being at ideal orientation, and some production loss over time.
The case we just described was proven to be true in Maine's landmark "Value of Solar" study, published in the spring of 2015 (See: Value of Solar ).
The study showed that a kilowatt-hour of distributed solar generation was, in fact, worth more than twice the retail rate of electricity!
Later in 2015, the Acadia Center produced a similar study for New Hampshire , which found "that the value of solar to the grid - and ratepayers connected to the grid - ranges from 19-24 cents/kWh, with additional societal values of 6.7 cents/kWh."
Again - solar was found to provide benefits to the grid greater than the expenses of compensating them under net metering .
Now, within the last few weeks, Maine's Value of Solar was updated by Crossborder Energy , and the latest finding is that every kilowatt-hour you send to the grid solar generates 10.9 cents of savings for other ratepayers .
This brings us to the claim that each 1kw of solar (4 panels) will save all ratepayers $3,000 over 25 years. The math?
1kw of solar = 1,200 kWh/yr over 25 years * 14 cents = $4,000 (rounded down slightly to count for panel depreciation).
Wow!
Solar is the ultimate win/win/win:
You win: by getting a system that reduces your electric bill and gives you energy independence.
Your neighbors win: by paying less to maintain an inefficient, overbuilt vintage electric grid.
The world wins: by having less carbon polluting fossil fuels burned.
