<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Obama&#8217;s State of the Union Means for Solar Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/what-obamas-state-of-the-union-means-for-solar-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/what-obamas-state-of-the-union-means-for-solar-power/</link>
	<description>Maine Solar Power Blog - Renewable Energy News, Solar Hot Water New Hampshire from ReVision Energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/what-obamas-state-of-the-union-means-for-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/?p=300#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Totally agreed, Abriel, too much effort towards big, centralized plants and not de-centralized, clean and efficient solar energy!  We definitely are advocates for a feed-in tariff - let&#039;s hope that effort gets traction again soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agreed, Abriel, too much effort towards big, centralized plants and not de-centralized, clean and efficient solar energy!  We definitely are advocates for a feed-in tariff &#8211; let&#8217;s hope that effort gets traction again soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abriel</title>
		<link>http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/what-obamas-state-of-the-union-means-for-solar-power/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Abriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revisionenergy.com/blog/?p=300#comment-283</guid>
		<description>I was very disappointed that &quot;clean coal&quot; got more mention then solar or wind. Nuclear is not the way to go, the current situation in Vermont is telling of one of the many problems nuclear poses. Nuclear is also too centralized, putting all of our eggs in one basket.  People need to stop asking for &quot;clean energy&quot; because that has lost its meaning with all this greenwashing. The idea that money needs to go into R&amp;D is an excuse to postpone actually building anything. A feed-in tariff would definitely be a fantastic step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very disappointed that &#8220;clean coal&#8221; got more mention then solar or wind. Nuclear is not the way to go, the current situation in Vermont is telling of one of the many problems nuclear poses. Nuclear is also too centralized, putting all of our eggs in one basket.  People need to stop asking for &#8220;clean energy&#8221; because that has lost its meaning with all this greenwashing. The idea that money needs to go into R&amp;D is an excuse to postpone actually building anything. A feed-in tariff would definitely be a fantastic step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
